Outcome
Name the useful result before asking an agentic worker to move. What outcome would make the work worth doing?
Field guide for agentic leadership
Directing is management. A practical field guide for leaders learning how to manage agentic workers with evidence, boundaries, cadence, attention, escalation, and human judgement.
The shift
When people use agentic systems well, they are not only producing output. They are setting intent, shaping tasks, judging quality, checking evidence, protecting attention, and staying responsible for what goes out into the world.
The skill is not magic prompting. It is management as a human literacy: knowing what good looks like, knowing what you do not know, and keeping yourself meaningfully in the loop.
Field guide
Use these as a practical check before giving an agentic worker more autonomy, more context, or more trust.
Name the useful result before asking an agentic worker to move. What outcome would make the work worth doing?
Say what the agentic worker may do, what the human owns, and who is accountable for the final decision.
Define what it can read, change, publish, spend, remember, and escalate before autonomy gets wider.
Ask what supports the answer, how confident you should be, what is missing, and what would change your mind.
Create a rhythm for review, exceptions, drift, lessons, and decisions that need slower human judgement.
Protect the scarce thing. Decide where attention belongs before tools, feeds, and agents spend it for you.
Pause when stakes rise, signals conflict, the pattern is novel, or the decision is not yours to make.
Judgement loop
Use this loop before widening autonomy, accepting high-confidence output, or moving from recommendation to decision.
What is the evidence, how strong is it, what is missing, and what would change our mind?
Who is affected, who has not been heard, and where does fairness matter most?
What feels off, which weak signals are present, and what could fail if we are overconfident?
Which rules, rights, thresholds, and accountabilities must hold even under pressure?
What human value, organisational purpose, or public good is this work ultimately meant to serve?
Decisions under scrutiny
Agentic work speeds up decisions. Leadership is making the uncertainty, accountability, blind spots, and review path visible before speed amplifies weak judgement.
Treat evidence as decision support. Ask what can be supported, with what confidence, for which decision, under which risks.
Build routines for dissent, premortems, stakeholder challenge, and review instead of relying on senior instinct alone.
People may dislike a decision and still respect the process when the reasoning, constraints, and review path are clear.
Oversight only works when the human has time, context, authority, evidence, and permission to intervene.
Attention and agency
If all a person does is click the button and accept what comes back, they are not in the loop. The value is in the judgement: what they asked, what they rejected, what evidence changed their mind, and where they chose to put attention.
First steps
This is not about banning AI or pretending it is magic. It is about showing people how to use it well enough that their own thinking becomes more visible.
Write three signs of a good answer before the agentic worker produces one.
Give context, audience, constraints, source expectations, and a clear stopping point.
Decide what the agent can read, change, publish, remember, or escalate before the task starts.
Ask for sources, assumptions, uncertainty, and rejection tests before accepting confident output.
Keep a small trail: what you asked, what changed your mind, what you rejected, and why.
Work harnesses
A chat can produce words. A harness lets an agentic worker see the work, use tools, change files, run checks, create reports, and bring evidence back for review.
Local files, repos, documents, data, and context are available instead of pasted fragments.
Code, scripts, browsers, checks, data tools, and plugins can be used inside the workflow.
The agent can update code, reports, pages, documents, and other working outputs.
Diffs, tests, previews, screenshots, logs, and smoke checks make quality inspectable.
Prompts, decisions, edits, evidence, and results become reviewable management records.
Starter harness links
The important question is not which logo wins. Ask what work it can see, what tools it can use, what it can change, how it verifies, and what evidence it leaves behind.
Coding agent for real engineering work: repos, edits, reviews, parallel tasks, and shipping workflows.
Open official page US / globalAgentic coding system that reads codebases, changes files, uses CLI tools, runs tests, and returns code for review.
Open official page US / globalAsynchronous GitHub agent with an ephemeral Actions environment for changes, tests, branches, and pull requests.
Open official page US / globalAsync coding agent for GitHub repos that works in a cloud VM, produces diffs, and opens pull requests.
Open official page Europe / Czech RepublicJetBrains coding agent for IDE and terminal workflows, with project edits, command execution, tests, and approvals.
Open official page Europe / FranceEuropean work and code agent for long-horizon tasks, company knowledge, tools, coding, deployment, and data residency options.
Open official page Europe / GermanyWorkflow harness for tool-connected agents, logic, code, integrations, human-in-the-loop guardrails, and self-hosting.
Open official page Europe / FranceMultiplayer AI workspace where agents connect to company knowledge, tools, conversations, and team workflows.
Open official page Europe / SwedenFull-stack AI development platform for turning natural language into editable, deployable web applications.
Open official pageCurated starter resources
This is a starter map, not a giant database. The point is to help leaders and managers find credible first routes into AI literacy, education guidance, and management literacy.
Free support materials for school and college staff using AI safely and effectively.
Open resource ScotlandNational guardrails for safe, ethical AI use while keeping teacher judgement central.
Open resource EuropeAI Act literacy expectations for providers, deployers, staff, and affected contexts.
Open resource GlobalStudent and teacher competency framing for education systems and curriculum teams.
Open resource OECDAssessment direction for proactive, critical engagement with digital and AI tools.
Open resource AustraliaSix principles for responsible and ethical generative AI in school education.
Open resource SingaporeResponsible, age-appropriate AI use with agency, inclusivity, fairness, and safety.
Open resource GlobalToolkit for education leaders creating practical AI guidance and policy.
Open resourceFollow-on essay
The canonical essay lives on Tonywood.org and makes the deeper argument: we should teach people how to manage themselves, tools, tasks, attention, risk, evidence, and outcomes.
Tony's writing
The follow-on essay: why AI makes management a general literacy, not a specialist title.
Tonywood.orgThe classroom argument for teaching attention, delegation, judgement, and interruption management.
Tonywood.orgHow students can look for human debt, learn what good looks like, and use AI without outsourcing judgement.
Tonywood.orgA practical note on roles, boundaries, success tests, escalation routes, and evidence trails.